Andrew Dominik’s most recent film
before Killing Them Softly was of
course The Assassination of Jesse James
by the Coward Robert Ford, a monumental American epic that went on for
close to three hours and felt like it could have continued forever. Even when
Jesse is killed, Robert Ford is still around and the movie shows no signs of
wanting quick closure-as if it’s caught under the same spell as we are.
Now for Dominik’s third film (his
first was Chopper 2000 picture that’s not talked about much anymore) he’s
tightened things up to a quick 96 minutes, moved from the Old American West to
the modern city, and prudently held onto his star from Jesse James, Brad Pitt.
That Pitt is in the film and
playing once again a criminal is emblematic of the fact that though in many
ways these are very different films both structurally and narratively, Dominik
has still maintained an interest in telling stories dominated by men who use
violence to establish legacy. And when I say dominated by men, I mean literally. The closest thing to a
substantial female role in Jesse James
was a brief appearance by Zoey Deschanel near the end. Here the only females
are hookers—unromantic, unhappy, cash-hungry.
There’s not really a place for
women in Dominik’s world of hardened street criminals, and if there is he’s
certainly not going to waste time with them. Here he’s all about business: men
smoking, drinking, killing, fighting, making money, and talking about smoking,
drinking, fighting, killing and making money. At the start we get two
small-time crooks, Frankie (Scoot McNairy) and Russell (Ben Mendelsohn) who are
enlisted to rob a poker room. The same room had recently been held up by its
proprietor, a man named Markie (Ray Liotta, doing his best work maybe since Goodfellas), who later admits to the
theft without suffering any immediate consequences. Frankie and Russell however
know that if they rob the place, Markie will be blamed for it.
This sets up the rest of the film,
which involves Brad Pitt’s Jackie Cogan arriving and making sure Markie and the
two thieves are taken down in order to keep the mob on good terms with the
local gambling scene. Jackie is cold, calculating, and cynical. He hates
sentimentality, both in the American and personal sense. He explains his
disdain for the emotional side of a murder, when the victim starts to weep,
which is why he likes shooting from a distance, “killing them softly.” As for
America, he sees the idea that we’re one nation, a community of equality as bullshit.
“In America, you’re on your own,” he says in an intense and memorable diatribe
at the film’s close.
Much has been made of Dominik
saturating the film with voiceovers and television footage of political
speeches during the 2008 election. Because the housing market crash we hear
plenty about the economic struggle, as well as the aforementioned “one nation”
American idealism addresses from Barack Obama.
While well intended and at times appropriate, the overall effect is definitely
forceful and obvious. Dominik certainly is on to something with the idea of
showing both how criminals are influencing the economy and also how their world
is far removed from normal society. So it’s understandable that Jackie would
scoff at the president’s optimistic orations on America’s communal identity. I
don’t know, the whole film is so tightly crafted that this slight splurge
ultimately isn’t really worth complaining about. Thematically it’s quite
compelling, and, to me, it makes Jackie’s rant at the end all the more
riveting. Dominik pummels us with this material because Jackie is hit with it
too. We don’t feel anything for him ever, but we do sort of feel his words
during the film’s electric final minutes.
And yet of course Jackie doesn’t really understand America, only the
criminal facet of it, which the film goes to great pains to present as brutal
and cruel and unhappy. Jackie’s nihilism makes perfect sense in the criminal
world, yet his viewpoint is undeniably limited. Dominik stresses during just
about every single running minute of the film just how unkind and selfish
everybody in it is. The film deserves applause simply for its refusal to
compromise these characters’ vicious lives. The temptation in most films would
be to show some humanity in someone like Jackie, not simply to show he has a
heart but to make the film an easier watch. Killing
Them Softly is blunt in its refusal to show these criminals as anything but
hardened felons.
Dominik stresses this in two ways:
through dialogue and through violence. The dialogue is persistent throughout,
with nearly every scene being built around it. There is not one word uttered by
anyone that would indicate they have empathy or feelings or care about anything
but money and their own well being. Dominik wrote the script from a 1974 George
Higgins novel, yet I imagine (partly because of the shift from the 1970s to
2008) that a good deal of the dialogue is his. It’s been said that he’s merely
playing on Tarantino’s method of firecracker conversation, yet I’m inclined to
disagree. Dominik sprays the screen with words with the incessancy of
Tarantino, but without the style or pizazz. It’s darker, not as funny, and
meant to impart a feeling of people who simply talk a lot rather than the
random discourse people have behind the scenes that you’ll find in Tarantino.
Dominik’s use of violence is
similar. Like Tarantino, it comes at intervals and with plenty of blood flow.
Yet again, contrary to Tarantino, it’s hardly stylized. Markie gets attacked
early on as two intruders enter his house. Dominik’s camera remains outside and
tracks along the side of the place as Markie is beat up and then thrown out the
back door. Call it a self-conscious exercise, but really Dominik is sticking to
his theme of deconstructing the myth of glorified violence by viewing it from a
careful distance.
Markie is later beat up after being
blamed for the second robbery, and Dominik goes to great lengths to draw out
the scene and make it as brutal and uncomfortable as possible. It’s excessive
but effective in that it continues to draw as far as possible from this world,
so that by the end it’s just about the most unappealing place that’s
imaginable.
Yet there is one problem, which is
when Markie is finally killed by Jackie while sitting in his car. Jackie pulls
up and fires three or four shots, sending Markie to kingdom come, yet the way
Dominik shoots the scene suggests a conflict of interests. It’s shot in ultra
slow motion, as we see Jackie’s semi-automatic release the bullets and slowly
travel through space, shatter the glass of Markie’s car, penetrate his body and
flood the vehicle with blood. It’s one of the best uses of slow motion I’ve
seen, but it sort of contradicts the hard realism that permeates the rest of
the film. It does look like it comes
right out of a Tarantino movie, and I honestly can’t figure out why Dominik
would shoot the scene that way for any reason but to look cool. And it comes
across as all the more jarring when Jackie makes his second kill and shoots his
victim through the window of a car with a single shot from a long way off. The car blocks the body and we don't even see it hit the pavement.
But with the exception of that inconsistency, Killing Them Softly does a remarkable
job of sticking to its agenda. It’s a beautifully made, terrifically acted,
no-nonsense crime movie, exactly what I wanted to see Dominik make after such a
wonderfully sprawling piece as Jesse
James.
No comments:
Post a Comment